Found for a specific use case, missed in general tool selection.
Two compatibility answers used the product as an example, including one citing official technical materials. All three general tool-selection answers omitted it. The diagnosis proposed clearer usage examples, compatibility conditions and data-flow guidance.
01 / FINDINGS
Findings
A specific use case reached official materials
Both completed compatibility answers named the product as an example; one cited official technical guidance. This establishes discovery in the sample, not compatibility with an actual deployment environment.
The general shortlist did not include the product
All three discovery answers listed other options without the target. The report recommends making the scope of different processing use cases directly comparable.
Feature descriptions need usage conditions
Feature documentation already existed. A separate review recommended placing data-processing boundaries and release-channel information alongside usage guidance, helping users assess their configuration and version.
02 / QUESTIONS & OUTCOMES
Question themes and diagnosis outcomes
Below are anonymized summaries of question intent, not the original prompts or answers. The original questions did not name the target, include its URL or add product material. Full prompts and results were delivered privately to the customer. Counts and classifications are unchanged; each question is assessed by its intent.
| Question theme / intent | GPT-6 Astra | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 · Processing options Compare document-processing options against how the output will be used. | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned |
| Q2 · Tool discovery Find candidate tools that preserve the information a document needs to retain. | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Not mentioned |
| Q3 · Environment compatibility Check compatibility conditions before an organization adopts a document tool. | Mentioned | Incomplete · unscored | Mentioned |
A mention does not establish a recommendation or an accurate description. Named questions and unprompted discovery are interpreted separately.
03 / RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommended priorities
Show processing results from one sample
Provide an authorized sample document and its actual outputs so users can compare information retention, later editing and reading, with limits stated.
Make compatibility conditions checkable
Organize support by entry point, content type and permissions, with a minimal verification procedure and a support route.
Align data-flow and release guidance
Explain where each feature processes data and align version information across download channels and documentation. Check later changes with the original prompts.
04 / SCOPE
Test scope
This search-augmented API diagnosis produced eight completed answers. Q3/Fable did not complete and is unscored. Returned search evidence and some request conditions differed across providers. No human consumer-interface or product-operation tests were performed. Absence is not automatically answer failure; proposed changes have not been implemented and retested.
NiubiGEO completed this report using model API tests. Human web and app testing can be arranged separately, with human testing supplied by NiubiStar.